CGMA vs CMA – Which is Right for You?

In January 2012 the AICPA and CIMA joined forces to create a new designation; the CGMA, or Chartered Global Management Accountant. Both are management accounting certifications, pitting the CGMA in direct competition with the CMA.

So how can you determine which is best suited for you?

Below I’m going to outline key elements of each designation so you can make the decision between CGMA vs CMA.

The History

The CMA exam has been around for more than 40 years. It has long been considered the designation of choice for those going into management related accounting fields.

The CGMA on the other hand, was created only a couple of years ago with the intention of extending the global reach of CMA recognition.

The CGMA is powered by the AICPA and CIMA, two of the world’s largest associations for public accountants and management accountants and you can actually attain this designation through either pathway, but the eligibility and requirements differ.

Eligibility and Requirements

This is one of the more critical aspects when consider CGMA vs CMA.

The CGMA is only available to members of AICPA and CIMA. If you follow the AICPA pathway you must be a member, as well as hold your CPA certification. Additionally, you are required to have 3 years of management accounting work experience and pass the CGMA exam.

Should you choose to go down the CIMA path you are required to have 3 years management accounting work experience, as well as be a member and pass certain CIMA exams including the CIMA Business Accounting certificate.

If you have experience in public accounting, you may supplement one of the three required years of experience with public accounting.

Unlike the CGMA where you have to be a member of either the CIMA or AICPA, there are fewer restrictions on the CMA. Eligibility is not restricted to members of IMA and anyone can join as long as they have a bachelor’s degree.

Regardless of which pathway you choose, as of January 2015 all CGMA candidates must now take the same final exam.

CMA candidates are also required to have relevant work experience, but they only need two consecutive years of managerial experience.

The range of work experience can include everything from public or non-public accounting, budget preparation, information system analysis, financial management, management consulting, research and even teaching.

If you are unsure if your work experience will be deemed eligible, please email the administrators as they will be able to let you know.

Understanding the CGMA Designation Fraud Allegations

One particularly distressing point that I would like to discuss about about the CGMA is that when it was first developed, the AICPA basically sold the certification for a fee. Simply put, thousands of CPA members were able to buy this designation, without ever having to take or pass an examination.

Besides being incredibly unethical, what this means is there are thousands of practicing CGMA’s who don’t possess the actual knowledge or skills. This is a real issue because there will be even more clients who will hire these individuals based on this supposed accreditation when in fact, the accountant never earned it. 

As you can imagine, the IMA and its designated CMAs were not impressed with this at all. It is very disappointing to know that there are so many people marketing themselves as having a laudable credential when it was really just a money grab for the AICPA. 

Thankfully now, all those who wish to have the CGMA title must earn it by meeting the requirements and passing the exam. 

Are Employers more likely to hire CMAs or CGMAs?

As we rolled into 2015 it became clear that there was a rising need for employees holding the CMA designation, but even before then it was fairly successful in the US.

As for other parts of the world, it is incredibly successful, but there are very few who actually hold the designation. This is due to the recent introduction of this designation in that country. 

The CGMA designation is still very young, so it’s not surprising that many countries aren’t as supportive of it. It will require a lot of work to build its reputation to compete against the CMA designation. This is definitely something to consider if you plan on working abroad and want to go through as a CGMA. You may also want to remember that you must have your CPA license before going for this designation. 

The breadth of management accounting topics tested on the CMA exam far outweigh that of the CGMA’s. Simply put, if your ultimate goal is to acquire management accounting knowledge and skills to further your influence in the workplace, the CMA designation is the way to go. 

The decision to choose CGMA vs CMA is yours though. After considering its requirements and career opportunities, make a decision that suits your goals. 

If you choose to go in the direction of the CMA then be sure to check out my CMA Exam Academy to help you pass on the first try!

Until next week,

signature_pic

Get Your FREE Copy of the
CMA Exam Part-One Textbook

HURRY! Only 1,000 FREE Copies Available

Save over $300 today by claiming your FREE copy of my CMA Part-One test prep textbook in paperback.

Written by CPAs and CMAs in an easy-to-understand format. It covers every single section and topic you'll be tested on your CMA exam.

Just help with shipping and handling charges and the textbook is yours for FREE.

Claim yours while supplies last. Click on “I Want My Free Textbook“ now.

I Want My Free Textbook

5 Comments on “CGMA vs CMA – Which is Right for You?”

  1. The CGMA is frankly not to be taken seriously. The thousands of CGMA’s out there didn’t even have to take any examination. The AICPA basically sold it for a small fee to any current CPA member, as a means to get the designation on the street and known. Some consider that highly unethical that the AICPA would engage in such a ruse. The public will have no idea which CGMA actually took the examination and met all requirements, or those who simply paid a small fee. Imagine selling the CPA designation without taking a test. What’s worse, all the professionals who willfully grabbed it up while they could, and are now marketing themselves as having some laudable credential. A money grab by the AICPA, and very misleading to the public. Your article really needs to clarify that point.

    1. Hello George,

      I totally appreciate your feedback on this. And I believe you have a solid point and will revise this article so people are aware of this. Thanks so much for your feedback. I greatly appreciate it.

      Nathan

    1. Raghuveer
      you are misunderstanding the difference between an MOU where one accounting association recognizes another credential as being roughly equal and the creation of a new “credential” by virtually the same association.
      While the CGMA is offered by a joint venture between CIMA and AICPA, essentially it is a clever ploy by the AICPA to create a management accounting credential and generate some more revenue for the association.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *